Criticizing and Evaluating of Rational Choice Theory from an Economics Methodology

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

10.22091/ise.2025.11677.1009

Abstract

Rational choice theory is the fundamental theory of mainstream economics which is trying to explain the ‎economic choices made by individuals and firms. According to this theory, if the preferences of individual ‎agents has the conditions of completeness and transitivity, then they are rational preferences and based on ‎them it is possible to derive utility theory, maximizing which will result in demand and supply function ‎which determine the choices of individual demanders and supplier. RCT, firstly, is based on special ‎account of theory which insists on fully abstract nature of scientific theory as well as a priori and deductive ‎methodology with unrealistic assumptions. Secondly it is comprised of controversial presumptions ‎including rational economic man, methodological individualism, economic rationality, consequentialism and ‎free market mechanism. Thirdly, insisting on abstractness, deductiveness, instrumentality and positivity ‎has resulted in major methodological defeat which largely reduces its scientific power. These deficiencies ‎pose the question whether it is really a scientific theory.‎

Keywords

Main Subjects