اثرات متقابل بین سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب: تحلیل مقایسه ای گروه‌های درآمدی کشورها

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار اقتصاد، گروه مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشکده علوم انسانی و اجتماعی، دانشگاه گلستان، گرگان. H.daliri@gu.ac.ir

چکیده

این مطالعه به بررسی رابطه پویای متقابل بین سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب در بین 154 کشور دنیا در دو گروه درآمدی و برای دوره 2022-2007 پرداخته است. با توجه به مبانی نظری، سرمایه اجتماعی که با اعتماد، شبکه‌­ها و هنجار­های اجتماعی شناخته می‌شود، به­عنوان یک عامل تعیین‌­کننده و با اثر متقابل با کیفیت حکمرانی که شامل کنترل فساد، حاکمیت قانون، کیفیت نظارت، اثر­بخشی دولت، ثبات سیاسی و عدم وجود خشونت و حق اظهارنظر و پاسخگویی است، مورد بررسی قرار گرفته است. به منظور ارزیابی ارتباط بین سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب، در ابتدا شاخص­های شش­گانه حکمرانی خوب با استفاده از روش معادلات ساختاری و تحلیل مؤلفه­های اصلی موزون شدند و در ادامه، با استفاده از روش خود­رگرسیون برداری در داده­های تابلویی، ارتباط متقابل بین سرمایه اجتماعی و حکمرانی خوب در دو گروه کشور­های با درآمد بیشتر از متوسط و کشور­های با درآمد کمتر از متوسط ارزیابی و مقایسه شد. نتایج این مطالعه نشان می‌دهد که سرمایه اجتماعی در کشور­های با درآمد کمتر از متوسط به­طور مثبت بر کیفیت حکمرانی تأثیر می‌­گذارد. از سوی دیگر، حکمرانی خوب به­طور معنا­داری موجب تقویت سرمایه اجتماعی می­شود. این اثر در کشور­های با درآمد کمتر از متوسط بزرگ­تر و در کشور­های با درآمد بیشتر از متوسط، پایدار­تر است. این یافته‌­ها مؤید ارتباط متقابل بین حکمرانی و سرمایه اجتماعی است، به­گونه­ای که اثر حکمرانی بر سرمایه اجتماعی مهم­تر و بزرگ­تر است. نتایج این مطالعه، پیامد­های سیاستی ارزشمندی برای توسعه پایدار از طریق مداخلات هدفمند متناسب با سطح درآمد و محیط اجتماعی-سیاسی کشور­ها ارائه می­‌دهد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Interactions between Social Capital and Good Governance: A Comparative Analysis of Income Groups

نویسنده [English]

  • Hassan Daliri
Associate Professor of Economics, Department of Management and Economics, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Golestan University, Gorgan, Iran. H.daliri@gu.ac.ir
چکیده [English]

This study investigates the dynamic reciprocal relationship between social capital and good governance across 154 countries, classified into two income groups, over the period 2007–2022. Based on the theoretical foundations, social capital—characterized by trust, networks, and social norms—is considered a determinant factor that interacts with the quality of governance, which encompasses control of corruption, rule of law, regulatory quality, government effectiveness, political stability and absence of violence, and voice and accountability. To evaluate the association between social capital and good governance, the six dimensions of good governance were first weighted using the Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) approach combined with Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Subsequently, a Panel Vector Autoregression (PVAR) model was employed to examine and compare the reciprocal effects between social capital and good governance across two groups of countries: those with above-median income and those with below-median income. The results indicate that social capital has a significant and positive effect on the quality of governance in lower-income countries. Conversely, good governance significantly strengthens social capital. Moreover, this effect is larger in lower-income countries but more persistent in higher-income countries. These findings confirm the existence of a mutual relationship between governance and social capital, suggesting that the impact of governance on social capital is stronger and more substantial. The results provide valuable policy implications for achieving sustainable development through targeted interventions tailored to countries’ income levels and socio-political environments.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • : Social Capital
  • Good Governance
  • Panel Vector Autoregression (PVAR)
  • Principal Component Analysis (PCA)
  • Structural Equation Modeling (SEM)

JEL Classification: Z13, H11, O15

مراجع

حق پناهان, حمیدرضا , کرمی, حامد و همتی, مجتبی . (1400). رابطه بین حکمرانی خوب و صیانت از سرمایه اجتماعی به عنوان یکی از مولفه های قدرت نرم با نگاهی به قانون اساسی ج.ا.ا. فصلنامه علمی مطالعات قدرت نرم, 11(1), 137-168.
دلیری، حسن (1401)، کاربرد نظریه سرمایه اجتماعی در توسعه اقتصادی، انتشارات دانشگاه گلستان، گرگان.
رنجبر, ایرج و غلامی, سمیرا . (1401). حکمرانی خوب، سرمایه‌ی اجتماعی و اعتماد سیاسی. دولت پژوهی, 8(32), 255-292. doi: 10.22054/tssq.2023.57688.1038
ساعی، علی، زارعیان، مریم، و خدایی، ابراهیم. (1392). تحلیل فازی رابطه سرمایه اجتماعی و دموکراسی مطالعه تطبیقی بین کشوری (2010 - 1990). مجله جامعه شناسی ایران، 14(2)، 3-29.
طبرسا, غلامعلی , قوچانی, فرخ و بادین دهش, مهران . (1394). بررسی تأثیر حکمرانی خوب بر سرمایۀ اجتماعی.  مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی، ", 2(2), 177-198. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2015.54975
Abbas, H. S. M., Abbas, S., Gillani, S., & Xu, X. (2024). Role of Digital-Government, Regional Integration, and Government Expenditures on Public Health Services in Selected Asian Economies. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-024-03379-8
Abbey, P., Tomlinson, P. R., & Branston, J. R. (2016). Perceptions of governance and social capital in Ghana's cocoa industry. Journal of Rural Studies, 44, 153-163.
Areia, N. P., Tavares, A. O., & Costa, P. J. M. (2023). Public perception and preferences for coastal risk management: Evidence from a convergent parallel mixed-methods study. Science of the Total Environment, 882, 163440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163440
Beckham, T. L., Cutts, B. B., Rivers, L., Dello, K., Bray, L., & Vilá, O. (2023). BRIDGE Builders – Leadership and social capital in disaster recovery governance. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 96, 103942.
Bjørnskov, C. (2009). How does social trust lead to better governance? An attempt to separate electoral and bureaucratic mechanisms. Public Choice, 144 (1–2), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9522-z
Bjørnskov, C. (2010). How does social trust affect economic growth? Southern Economic Journal, 76 (3), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.4284/sej.2010.76.3.873
Bjrnskov, Christian, 2009. "Social trust and the growth of schooling," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(2), pages 249-257, April.
Boix, C., & Posner, D. N. (1998). Social capital: Explaining its origins and effects on government performance. British Journal of Political Science, 28 (4), 686–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123498000313
Cao, Q., Zhu, T., & Yu, W. (2024). ESG investment and bank efficiency: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 133, 107516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107516
Castiglione, D., Van Deth, J. W., & Wolleb, G. (2007). The handbook of social capital. Oxford University Press.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
Daliri, H. (2022). Application of social capital theory in economic development. Gorgan: Golestan University Press. (In Persian)
Daliri, H. (2024). The role of good governance in economic growth: Evidence from income groups. Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, 12 (2), 345-368. https://doi.org/10.22099/ijes.2025.51754.1982
Farr, J. (2004). Social capital: A conceptual history. Political Theory, 32 (1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591703254978
Feist, A., Plummer, R., & Baird, J. (2020). The inner-workings of collaboration in environmental management and governance: A systematic mapping review. Environmental Management, 66 (5), 801–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01337-x
 
Grimmelikhuijsen, S., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137-157.Haghpanahian, H., Karami, H., & Hemati, M. (2021). The relationship between good governance and protection of social capital as one of the components of soft power. Soft Power Studies, 11 (1), 137-168. (In Persian)
Han, G., & Yan, S. (2019). Does food safety risk perception affect the public’s trust in their government? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16 (11), 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111874
Horigue, V., Fabinyi, M., Pressey, R. L., Foale, S., & Aliño, P. M. (2016). Influence of governance context on the management performance of marine protected area networks. Coastal Management, 44 (1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2016.1116678
Hyden, G. (2006). African politics in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Ibitomi, T., Micah, E. E. M., Gaude-Jiwul, P. S., Aiyedogbon, O. J., & Lawrence, M. O. (2024). Test of good governance in Nigeria using World Bank indicators. *Global Sustainability Research, 3*(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.56556/gssr.v3i1.622
Idrassen, H., El Yazidi, H., & Boujrouf, S. (2024). A community-based conservation approach model. *Biodiversity and Conservation*. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-024-02843-8
Jin, G.-H. (2012). A study about the effects of social capital on social welfare governance. Social Welfare Policy, 39 (4), 205–230. https://doi.org/10.15855/swp.2012.39.4.205
Kaufmann, Daniel and Kraay, Aart and Zoido, Pablo, Governance Matters (August 1999). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=188568
Khan, M. S. (2020). Quality of governance, social capital and corruption: Local governance and the Pakistan marketplace. Review of Social Economy, 80 (2), 220–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2020.1734228
Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (4), 1251–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
Kobayashi, K. (2014). Community-based water management and social capital. Water Intelligence Online, 13. https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780405469
Luo, H., Ye, Y., Zhou, C., & Zhao, J. (2024). Collective participation in conservation easements in rural China: Evidence from the Qianjiangyuan National Park. Forest Policy and Economics, 163, 103230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103230
Mahaarcha, D., & Sirisunhirun, S. (2023). Social capital and farmers’ participation in multi-level irrigation governance in Thailand. Heliyon, 9 (8), e18793.
Narayan, D., & Pritchett, L. (1999). Cents and sociability: Household income and social capital in rural Tanzania. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47 (4), 871–897. https://doi.org/10.1086/452436
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.
Ranjbar, I., & Golami, S. (2022). Good governance, social capital and political trust. State Studies, 8 (32), 255-292. (In Persian)
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2008). The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Comparative Politics, 40 (4), 441–459. https://doi.org/10.2307/20434095
Rothstein B, Uslaner EM. (2005). All for All: Equality, Corruption, and Social Trust. World Politics. 58(1):41-72. doi:10.1353/wp.2006.0022
Sumkoski, G. (2016). Towards socio-economic theory and practice of regulation: Evidence from OECD countries and Bangladesh. Cogent Social Sciences, 2 (1), 1254840. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2016.1254840
Sumkoski, G. (2018). Regulation and social capital. Journal of Social and Economic Development, 20 (1), 152–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40847-018-0056-4
Tabarsa, G., Ghouchani, F., & Badin Dahesh, M. (2015). The impact of good governance on social capital. Social Capital Management, 2 (2), 177-198. (In Persian)
Tan, J. J., & Arceo, V. R. (2024). Women driving Philippine entrepreneurship: Social and governance issues as mediated by economic development. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 14 (1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40497-024-00398-0
Uslaner, E. M. (2004). Trust and corruption. In J. G. Lambsdorff, M. Taube, & M. Schramm (Eds.), The new institutional economics of corruption (pp. 76–92). Routledge.
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Towards a theoretical synthesis and a policy framework. Theory and Society, 27 (2), 151–208.
Young, Y. (2014). Social context and social capital: Governance, inequality, and the individual experience. International Journal of Sociology, 44 (2), 37-62.

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار