منابع رشد اقتصادی و رشد بهره‌وری نیروی کار ایران

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران، ma.mahmood@iau.ac.ir

2 استادیار، گروه اقتصاد، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران

3 دانشجوی دکتری اقتصاد، واحد فیروزکوه، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، فیروزکوه، ایران

10.22091/ise.2025.14353.1077

چکیده

هدف این مقاله ارزیابی منابع رشد اقتصادی و بهره‌وری نیروی کار (تولید به ازای هر ساعت) در ایران در چارچوب حسابداری رشد در دوره 2002-1990 و زیربازه‌های مختلف است. تاکید این مقاله بر بهره وری بر حسب ساعات کاری، خدمات سرمایه فاوا و غیرفاوا (به جای موجودی سرمایه) و تفکیک کمیت و کیفیت شاغلان است. محاسبات نشان می‌دهد. در کل دوره، مجموع نقش نهاده‌های سنتی (سرمایه فیزیکی و نیروی کار کمی) برابر با 6/2 درصد از رشد 6/3 درصد بوده (72 درصد رشد) است. مجموع سهم سرمایه فاوا و کیفیت نیروی کار 8/0 درصد (22 درصد رشد) است. سهم رشد بهره‌وری کل 2/0 درصد (6 درصد رشد اقتصادی) برآورد می‌شود. همچنین مشارکت سرمایه غیرفاوا 15/1 درصد از رشد 8/1 درصد (9/64 درصد) بهره‌وری نیروی کار در دوره 2002-2006 است. سهم خدمات سرمایه فاوا برابر با 1/0 درصد (6/5 درصد رشد بهره‌وری) و مجموع سهم خدمات سرمایه فاوا و غیر فاوا 4/69 درصد است. کیفیت نیروی کار 24/0 درصد (3/13 درصد از رشد) و سهم بهره وری کل 3/0 درصد (7/16 درصد رشد بهره‌وری کار) بوده است. آشکار است نهاده‌های سنتی همچنان نقش غالب در رشد اقتصادی و بهره‌وری نیروی کار ایران دارند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Sources of Economic Growth and Labor Productivity Growth in Iran

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mahmood Mahmoodzadeh 1
  • Masood Sofimajidpour 2
  • Abolfazl Ferdosi 3
1 Associate Professor, Department of Economics, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran , mahmood.ma@iau.ac.ir
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran
3 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, Fi.C., Islamic Azad University, Firuzkuh, Iran
چکیده [English]

The aim of this article is to evaluate the sources of economic growth and labor productivity (output per hour) in Iran within the framework of Growth Accounting in the period 1990-2002 and different sub-periods. The emphasis of this article is on productivity in terms of working hours, ICT and non-ICT capital services (instead of capital stock), and the separation of quantity and quality of employees. Calculations show that in the entire period, the total contribution of traditional inputs (physical capital and quantitative labor) was equal to 2.6 percent point of the 3.6 percent economic growth (72 percent). The total contribution of ICT capital and labor quality is 0.8 percent point (22 percent). The contribution of total productivity growth is estimated at 0.2 percent point (6 percent economic growth). Also, the contribution of non-IT capital is 1.15 percent of the 1.8 percent point (64.9 percent) growth in labor productivity in the period 2002-2006. The share of ICT capital services is 0.1 percent (5.6 percent) and the total share of ICT and non-IT capital services is 69.4 percent. The quality of the labor force is 0.24 percent point (13.3 percent) and the share of total productivity growth is 0.3 percent point (16.7 percent). It is clear that traditional inputs still play a dominant role in Iran's economic growth and labor productivity.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Growth Accounting
  • Capital Services
  • Labor Quality
  • Labor Productivity
  • Iran

مراجع

سعیدی,علی , فراهانی فرد,سعید و بهرامی,حسین . (1403). بررسی شاخص های فضای کسب و کار با رویکرد اقتصاد مقاومتی با روش گراف مشابهت. فصلنامه علمی پژوهشی راهبرد اقتصادی, 13(48), 147-202. doi: 10.22034/es.2024.433189.1731
نمایی قاسمی، محسن، فتح آبادی، مهدی، صوفی مجیدپور، مسعود و محمودزاده، محمود. (1404). پیشران‌های رشد اقتصادی کشورهای منا: تحلیل تجربی با استفاده از روش‌های حسابداری رشد درون‌زا. تحلیل های اقتصادی توسعه ایران، 11 (1). doi: 10.22051/ieda.2024.47863.1430
Aghion, P., & Howitt, P. (1992). A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60(2), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.2307/2951599
Baumol, W. J. (1976). Selected Economic Writings of William J. Baumol (E. E. Bailey, Ed.). New York University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
Corrado C, Haskel J, Jona-Lasinio C, Iommi M (2013). Innovation and intangible investment in Europe, Japan and the US, Oxford Review of Economic Policy 29(2):261e286.
Corrado C, Hulten C, Sichel D (2009). Intangible capital and U.S.economic growth, Review of Income and Wealth 55(3): 658e660.
Diewert, W. E. (2001). The measurement of capital. In Measuring Capital in the New Economy (pp. 11–46).
Farach, A., Cambon, A., & Spataro, J. (2025). Evolving the productivity equation: Should digital labor be considered a new factor of production? arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.09408
Ghasemi, Mohsen, Fathabadi, Mehdi, Sofi Majidpour, Masoud and Mahmoudzadeh, Mahmoud. (1404). Drivers of Economic Growth in MENA Countries: An Empirical Analysis Using Endogenous Growth Accounting Methods. Economic Analysis of Development of Iran, 11 (1). doi: 10.22051/ieda.2024.47863.1430 (In Persian)
Hill, R. J. (2000). The measurement of capital services in the UK: A review of the literature. Economic Journal, 110(463), F1–F14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00477
Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(4), 1403–1448. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1403
Hulten, C. R. (1990). Productivity change and capacity utilization. Journal of Econometrics, 33(1–2), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90026-6ScienceDirect
IMF (2021). Tracing Productivity Growth Channels in the UK. IMF Working Paper WP/21/273. https://www.imf.org/-/media/Files/Publications/WP/2021/English/wpiea2021273-print-pdf.ashx
IMF (2024 b). Regional Economic Outlook: Middle East and Central Asia, October 2024. International Monetary Fund.
IMF (2024a).  Global shocks unfolding: Lessons from fragile and conflict-affected states (WP/24/214). https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2024/10/04/Global-Shocks-Unfolding-Lessons-from-Fragile-and-Conflict-affected-States-555906
Jorgenson DW, Ho MS, Stiroh KJ (2005). Information technology and the American growth resurgence, Cambridge, MA,  MIT Press.
Jorgenson DW, Stiroh KJ (2000). Raising the speed limit: U.S. economic growth in the information age, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1:125e211.
Jorgenson, D. W., & Griliches, Z. (1967). The explanation of productivity change. The Review of Economic Studies, 34(3), 249–283. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296675
Kumar S, Russell RR (2002). Technological change, technological catch-up, and capital deepening: relative contributions to growth and convergence, The American Economic Review 92(3):527e548.
Malik, M. A., & Masood, T. (2020). An analysis of economic diversification of Middle Eastern countries. Saudi Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(2), 72–76. https://doi.org/10.36348/sjef.2020.v04i02.002
OECD. (2025a). OECD Compendium of Productivity Indicators 2025. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b024d9e1-en
OECD. (2025b). Towards more timely measures of labour productivity growth (OECD Statistics Working Papers No. 2025/01). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/436ecbb5-en
Oliner SD, Sichel DE (2002). Information technology and productivity: where are we now and where are we going? Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review 87:15e44.
O'Mahony, M., & van Ark, B. (2003). The productivity gap between Europe and the United States: Trends and causes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 22(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.22.1.25
Rafiqul Islam, M., & Al-Yahya, K. (2019). Economic growth and productivity in the GCC countries: A growth accounting approach. World Development, 120, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.01.007
Richmond Federal Reserve Bank. (2025). Sectoral determinants of aggregate productivity growth. Economic Brief, August 2025. https://www.richmondfed.org/publications/research/economic_brief/2025/eb_25-08
Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), S71–S102. https://doi.org/10.1086/261725
Saeedi, A., Farahanifard, S., & Bahrami, H. (2024). Designing Indicators of Business Environment with The Approach of Resistance Economy Theory. Economic Strategy, 13(48), 147-202.
Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70 (1), 65–94. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513
The Conference Board. (2025). Total Economy Database™ [Data set]. https://www.conference-board.org/topics/total-economy-database
Triplett, J. E. (1996). The measurement of services output and productivity growth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1996(1), 1–87. https://doi.org/10.2307/2534575
Triplett, J. E. (1998). The early history of the productivity measurement and the development of the capital services concept. The Review of Income and Wealth, 44(2), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.1998.tb00131.x
Vu KM  (2013b). The dynamics of economic growth: policy insights from comparative analyses in Asia, Cheltenham and Northampton, Edward Elgar.
Vu KM (2013a). Information and communication technology and Singapore’s economic growth, Information Economics and Policy 25(4):284e300.
World Bank. (2021). Global productivity: Trends, drivers, and policies. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2022). Global productivity: Trends, drivers, and policies. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/en/research/publication/global-productivity
World Bank. (2025). Shifting gears: The private sector as an engine of growth in MENA. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/video/2025/05/08/-shifting-gears-the-private-sector-as-an-engine-of-growth-in-middle-east-and-north-africa-mena
World Bank. (2025, April).Growth in the Middle East and North Africa forecast to moderately accelerate in 2025 amidst uncertainty. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2025/04/23/growth-in-the-middle-east-and-north-africa-forecast-to-moderately-accelerate-in-2025-amidst-uncertainty
Zhao, X., & Liu, J. (2025). The impact of digital infrastructure on labor productivity. Economic Analysis and Policy, 86(C), 274–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.030

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار